Logotipo Fundación Kovacs
  Home   Español   Glossary   Map   Contact   The web of the back   Back Pain Research Network
 The Foundation Medical Research Health Care Promoting Public Health
  The Kovacs Back Units
  Control and Results
  Kinds of Care and Number of Patients

Health Care >> Control and results>>Anonymous Surveys

  Analysis of the Situation and Clinical Evolution of the Patients
  The Duration of Each Medical Act
  Audits of care provided
  Anonymous Surveys
  Results

  ANONYMOUS SURVEYS

To evaluate the degree of satisfaction of the patients cared for at the Units, the Foundation has designed a survey on organizational, medical and care/service aspects. The questionnaire is available at all Units and all patients are encouraged to fill it out. The answers are anonymous and it can be handed in at the Unit or sent directly to the Foundation headquarters without postage. Thus the patients can express his or her opinion without channeling it through the Unit where he or she was attended. The questionnaire consists of 10 questions and a section for suggestions.

The analysis of the responses allows the Foundation:

  1. To know the degree of patient satisfaction with the care and attention received.

  2. To compare the perceptions the surveyed patients have of their evolution with the data acquired from the informational computer program that covers their evolution from a medical point of view.

  3. To compare the results from the different Units.

  4. To detect any aspect that can be improved in the care given at any Unit.

  5. To analyze the patients' suggestions to improve their satisfaction with the care offered.

The questions in the survey and the percentage of patients who have answered each question are shown in the table below. It includes the questionnaires filled out by patients from the three different models of care provided by the Foundation: charity care, private care and coordinated care.


Survey on Care Provided

Analysis of the answers collected in the 19.624 questionnaires filled out up to June 1, 2004.


1. How was the treatment received on the telephone when you called to schedule your appointment?

Very Pleasant

14.326

(73%)

Pleasant

3.336

(17%)

Average

1.766

(9%)

Unpleasant

0

 

Very unpleasant

0

 


2. How was the waiting time, from the moment of your arrival to the moment you were attended by the doctor?

Very Short

8.635

(44%)

Short

6.869

(35%)

Average

3.532

(18%)

Long

392

(2%)

Excessive

0

 


3. How was the treatment received from the non-medical personnel?

Very Pleasant

14.326

(73%)

Pleasant

4.121

(21%)

Average

1.177

(6%)

Unpleasant

0

 

Very unpleasant

0

 


4. How was the treatment received from the doctor?

Very Pleasant

14.914

(76%)

Pleasant

3.925

(20%)

Average

785

(4%)

Unpleasant

0

 

Very unpleasant

0

 


5. How was the information you received?

Optimal

10.205

(52%)

Appropriate

7.850

(40%)

Adequate

1.177

(6%)

Inadequate

196

(1%)

Null

0

 


6. How would you rate the professional competence of the doctor you consulted?

Very Good

14.522

(74%)

Good

4.710

(24%)

Average

196

(1%)

Poor

0

 

Very poor

0

 


7. How do the facilities of this Unit appear to you, in terms of their cleanliness and maintenance?

Very Good

14.522

(74%)

Good

3.925

(20%)

Average

1.177

(6%)

Bad

0

 

Very Bad

0

 


8. In general, the health care you received has been:

Very Good

12.756

(65%)

Good

6.476

(33%)

Average

392

(2%)

Poor

0

 

Very poor

0

 


9. Do you feel that this Unit has been able to identify your back problem and to determine its treatment correctly?

Yes

18.839

(96%)

No

196

(1%)

No comment

589

(3%)


10. If in the future, a family member had a similar problem, would you recommend that he or she come to this Unit?

Yes, as soon as he or she had a back problem

17.662

(90%)

Yes, but only if the problem hadn't been solved at other health centers

981

(5%)

No

0

 
up subir
© Fundación Kovacs 2005