Logotipo Fundación Kovacs
  Home   Español   Glossary   Map   Contact   The web of the back   Back Pain Research Network
 The Foundation Medical Research Health Care Promoting Public Health
  Objective and general criteria
  Priority fields of investigation
  Research projects on back disorders
  Research Projects on the System of K-Channels
  Other Lines of Research

Medical Research>> Research projects on back disorders>> Projects on aspects of assessment, diagnosis and prognosis >> Objectification of neck sprain (whiplash)

  Projects on risk factors
  Projects on aspects of assessment, diagnosis and prognosis
  - Validation of the Spanish version of the Roland-Morris Scale.
  - Relation between pain intensity and degree of disability and level of quality of life in patients with back pain.
  - Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a questionnaire on fear and avoidance behaviors due to back pain.
  - The validity of the Spanish version of the Roland-Morris Scale to measure the degree of disability due to low-back pain with sciatica and sciatica without low back pain.
  - Comparative validity of the different components of the EuroQol Scale to determine the quality of life in patients with back pain.
  - The effect of chronification on the quality of life in patients with back pain.
  - Influence of beliefs in the deterioration of quality of life associated with back pain.
  - Determination of the natural course of acute and subacute low back pain.
  - Development of models allowing for the early prediction of the risk of long-term sick leave.
  - Low back function evaluation.
  - Objectification of neck sprain (whiplash).
  - MMICS Study (Musculoskeletal Multinational Inception Cohort Study).
  Projects on treatments
  Projects on clinical practice

  OBJECTIFICATION OF NECK SPRAIN (WHIPLASH)

Title.

The value of objective appraisal of cervical mobility for the diagnosis of neck sprain (whiplash).

Background.

"Whiplash" or neck sprain consists of pain in the neck and upper back area that appears after a brusque flexo-extension movement (typically, after a car accident in which one has been hit from behind), and in which there is no objectifable injury revealed in the complementary tests.

The diagnosis of the syndrome is purely clinical; there are no objective tests that demonstrate it, and in some cases the evolution is torpid, tending to become chronic. Few treatments have been shown to be truly effective.

In fact, some doctors question the validity of the diagnosis itself, arguing that its presence is tied exclusively to psycho-social factors (and essentially, the pursuit of work or economic compensation as a result of the trauma that it caused), since the frequency and duration of the syndrome in different countries appear to be associated with the current legislation in each area. However, this is not the unanimous posture of the medical community. Some earlier studies suggest that there are differences in the mobility and neuromuscular activity of those who suffer the syndrome in comparison with healthy subjects and that the psychological disorders found in the patients are a consequence-rather than a cause-of the syndrome. In truth, today there is a debate about the very existence of the syndrome, and therefore, about the most appropriate way to treat it.

It is necessary to try to objectify the syndrome's existence-and eventually, some of the characteristics that allow one to follow its clinical evolution in a reliable manner-in order to be able to compare the effectiveness and the efficacy of different treatments afterwards.

Preliminary studies made with low back pain patients and healthy subjects suggest that the characteristics of spinal mobility vary in accordance with the existence of pain, which opens the possibility of extrapolating these findings to other segments of the spine and to the study of cervical whiplash.

Objective.

To determine whether the detailed analysis of the characteristics of cervical mobility allow one to define:

  • Deteriorations in mobility that are specific to patients with neck sprain and to discriminate the pathological behaviors of simulation.

  • Parameters with prognostic value.

  • Useful parameters for the follow up of the patients' evolution.

Methodology.

The study is currently in the design phase, so that the general proposition this section reflects is only an approximation. In principle, it is a matter of establishing four groups:

  • One with an objectifiable organic disorder that can be shown to be responsible for the symptoms in a specific patient (in principle, symptomatic cervical disc hernias).

  • One with non-specific pain.

  • One of the healthy subjects that had suffered neck pain in the past and who would be asked to imitate in movement the characteristics of their mobility when they had pain (who would act as a "control group similar to the simulators").

  • One of healthy subjects (which would be the control group).

An analysis of mobility of the subjects in the four groups would be made and the evolution of the first two over time would be followed, until their recovery. Finally, the characteristics of mobility in the four groups and their evolution over time would be analyzed.

Participants, along with the Foundation's Science Department.

Participating groups and centers in the Spanish Network of Researchers in Back Disorders. Within the Network, groups form the Kovacs Foundation, the Biomechanics Institute of Valencia, the Department of Neurosurgery of the Hospital de Son Dureta, the Spine Unit at the Hospital Vall d'Hebrón and Primary Care teams from Mallorca, Menorca and Ibiza are responsible for the work group designing the study.

Status.

In the design phase; at the same time, the possibility of making the instruments to analyze the characteristics of mobility available in each one of the clinical centers that may participate in the study is being studied, since this is an essential aspect to assure its viability.

 

subir subir
© Fundación Kovacs 2005